What actually happened was that the Country Email List null vote was massive and –again in the conceptual model–, given that most of the null votes came from the Pérez vote and were votes that Arauz did not receive, those null votes not only Country Email List helped raise Lasso's percentage of valid votes, but literally helped him win. How big was the effect of this dramatic increase in the number of invalid votes? Very big. In five provinces, Arauz obtained fewer votes than the null vote. Of these, Azuay and Tungurahua are the fifth and seventh Country Email List provinces with the highest number of voters, while Cotopaxi and Chimborazo have a considerable number of voters.
There is another way to propose this Country Email List argument: rather than lose against Lasso, Arauz lost against the invalid vote. Who would have won if the null had been 10%-11% instead of 16.2%, as it happened? Or more appropriately to Country Email List illustrate the same point, who would have won if only 10%-15% of Yaku Pérez's votes had turned into null votes? In the extreme, who would have won if none of Pérez's votes had become null? The Country Email List answer: Arauz. It is due to the massive invalid vote that Arauz, having had a considerable advantage of 13 percentage points over Lasso.
Grows very modestly in the percentage of Country Email List valid votes in all provinces between the first and second rounds. Lasso, for his part, obtains slightly more votes than expected (that is, assuming several reasonable assumptions regarding the Country Email List votes of the other candidates), but grows considerably in the percentage of valid votes in all provinces between the first and second rounds. of the presidential elections. A comment to finish. What Country Email List has been said here does not ignore the merit or effectiveness of Lasso's campaign.